Legal Opinion

Hadley v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 12, 1967No. 1179 MPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for further consideration in light of Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U. S. 523.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent and would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Clark’s dissenting opinion in Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U. S., at 546.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. PatukonisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. City of Boston v. DitsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  4. Decoulos v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. PorrazzoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API