Legal Opinion

Claim of Smith v. Warren Nash Motor Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 24, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The failure to give written notice of injury has been excused upon the ground that the employer was not prejudiced because “ had the employer had notice in thirty minutes and had he employed the finest eye expert, the sight of the eye could not have been restored.” This is not a sufficient ground for excusing this failure. (Bellanca v. Spencer Lens Co., 214 App. Div. 824; Matter of Bloomfield v. November, 223 N. Y. 265; Matter of Hynes v. Pullman Co., Id. 342.) Section 18 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law states the grounds on which such failure can be excused. One ground is that the employer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Bloomfield v. . NovemberNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Matter of Bloomfield v. . NovemberNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Bellanca v. Spencer Lens Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frost v. Idaho Gold Dredging Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Claim of Zraunig v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Claim of Tillotson v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Choudhury v. Brooklyn Hebrew Home & HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  5. Claim of Orientale v. Marcus Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API