Legal Opinion

Harwell v. Rohrabacher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1955Published

1Opinion of the Court

BáRNHILL, C. J.

The defendant challenges the validity of the judgment entered in the court below on jurisdictional grounds. A magistrate has jurisdiction in an ejectment action only when there is a contract of rental and the relation of landlord and tenant exists between the plaintiff and the defendant.

“The jurisdiction of a justice of the peace in civil actions for recovery of possession of real estate is entirely statutory' — and is derived from the landlord and tenant act providing for summary ejectment. (Statute cited.) Such jurisdiction may be exercised only in cases where the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Simons v. . LebrunSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Lawrence v. . EllerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Howell v. . BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Jerome v. . SetzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API