Robinaugh v. Rogers
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BARTEAU, Judge.
Elizabeth Robinaugh, an Arizona resident, appeals the trial court's denial of her motion to dismiss James Rogers' Petition to Establish Paternity. She argues that her motion should have been granted because the Indiana court has no personal jurisdiction over her. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
As this is an appeal from a motion to dismiss, we must consider the facts most favorable to the non-movant. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Comm'r of Dep't of Ins. (1983), Ind.App., 452 N.E.2d 441. James Rogers, the putative father, is a resident of Arizona. Though not married, he and Ro-binaugh…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Baseball Card World, Inc. v. PannetteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Commissioner of the Department of InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hepner v. HepnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lee v. DeShaneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Paternity of RobinaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Goens v. RoseIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002