Legal Opinion
Conklin Farm v. Leibowitz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 12, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
274 N.J. Super. 525 (1994)
644 A.2d 687
CONKLIN FARM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DORIS LEIBOWITZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 2, 1994.
Decided July 12, 1994.
Before Judges R.S. COHEN and D'ANNUNZIO.
Howard C. Trueger argued the cause for appellant (Howard C. Trueger, attorney; Mr. Trueger of counsel, and Marisa A. Taormina on the brief).
Michael V. Gilberti argued the cause for respondent (Budd Larner Gross Rosenbaum Greenberg & Sade, attorneys; Michael M. Rosenbaum and Michael V. Gilberti on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by R.S.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension Fund Commission v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Ellingson v. Walsh, O'Connor & BarnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Plaza Realty Investors v. BaileyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Seventy-Three Land v. MAXLARNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Magrini v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Regency Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Morristown Mews, L.P.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Citizens Bank of Massachusetts v. Parham-Woodman Medical AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Conklin Farm v. LeibowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995