Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hardy

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1980No. 14700Published

1DissentJustice Sheehy

On the record, the defendant is guilty of a violation of section 45-6-203, MCA, criminal trespass to property, and perhaps a violation of section 45-6-101, MCA, criminal mischief and nothing more.

There is no evidence to support his conviction of burglary under section 45-6-204, MCA.

As noted in the majority opinion, the offense of burglary is committed when a person knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in an occupied structure “with the purpose to commit an offense therein.” Section 45-6-204, MCA. The State proved the defendant’s unlawful entry, but it failed to prove his purpose to commit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. State v. AustadMontana Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API