Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Darby v. Darby

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1985No. 14766Published

1ConcurrenceWollman, Justice

ly)-

I agree fully with the majority opinion that the trial court lacked authority to vacate the divorce decree upon the stipulation of the parties and that in the circumstances of the case before us the doctrine of estop-pel should not be applied against appellee. *208There may be cases, however, in which one who has stipulated to the entry of judgment may be estopped from later assailing that judgment. As we held in Warren Supply v. Duerr, Pliley, Thorsheim Development, 355 N.W.2d 838, 840 (S.D.1984):

One who enters into a stipulation or agreement for judgment or who has taken a position in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warren Supply Co. v. Duerr, Pliley, Thorsheim Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Losee v. HettichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bernard v. BernardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API