Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip Morris Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 17, 2002No. Civil Action No. 99-2496(GK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
On April 9, 2002, the Special Master issued Report and Recommendation #43 (“R & R #43”), recommending certain guidelines for the conduct of depositions as well as an amendment to Order #51. In response to the United States’ Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Conduct by Joint Defendants During Depositions, the Special Master recommended denying the Motion as to all Joint Defendants other than Brown & Williamson, because of Plaintiffs failure to satisfy the procedural requirements to meet and confer set forth in LCvR 7.1(m),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hall v. Clifton PrecisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Morales v. Zondo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Odone v. Croda International PLC.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mazloum v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp. v. CuraScript Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2007
- Oregon Laborers Employers Pension Trust Fund v. Maxar Technologies Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2022