Legal Opinion
Michael Lucius White v. State of Colorado Roy Romer Aristedes Zavaras Dave Holt Roderic Gottula Joseph McGarry
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1996No. 95-1273PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, appeals 1 the district court’s decision granting defendants summary judgment on his claims asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Rehabilitation Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 794, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213(ADA). 2 This court reviews a summary judgment decision de novo, viewing the record in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Carl v. City of Overland Park, 65 F.3d 866, 868 (10th Cir.1995). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuinely disputed material issues of fact and the moving…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Green v. BransonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Jordan v. SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Ricky Crawford v. Indiana Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Gorman v. BartchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Armstrong v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.