Legal Opinion

State v. Dorsey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1983No. 8226SC448PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Although we do not concede the correctness of the judge’s conclusion that the informant was an agent of the State or the legal consequence thereof if he had been, it is not necessary to reach that question in order to dispose of this appeal.

A search made pursuant to a valid search warrant is prima facie evidence of the reasonableness of the search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. State v. Turnbull, 16 N.C. App. 542, 192 S.E. 2d 689 (1972). A search warrant is presumed to be valid unless irregularity appears on its face. State v. Spillars, 280 N.C. 341, 185 S.E.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SpillarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API