Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. New Durham Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, for 250 cords of slabs, butts, and edgings claimed by the plaintiffs as rent of a saw-mill. Facts found by a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

July 1, 1879, McDuffee leased to the plaintiffs, by an instrument under se'al, at an annual rent of $250 for the term of five years, the acid building, saw-mill, and a tenement-house at the Powder Mills in New Durham, and the plaintiffs leased the saw-mill to Holten for the same term by a lease under seal, reserving as an annual rent the sum of one dollar and all slabs and butts which might be made at the mill after July 1, 1880. September 7, 1882, McDuffee conveyed to the defendants all the real estate owned by Mm in New Durham, including the leased premises subject to the lease, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Haverhill Water Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  2. Barron v. MarshSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keefe v. Sullivan County RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API