Legal Opinion
Fox v. Queens County Sales Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 20, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
Plaintiff, pursuant to section 3207 of the Revised Statutes (Title 26, § 136, USCA) *795after duly obtaining leave to do so, filed this bill in chancery, for a final determination of all claims to, or liens upon, the real estate in question.
Plaintiff is a first mortgagee. Her mortgage of $3,150 was made by the defendant Queens County Sales Company, March 31, 1927, and duly recorded April 7, 1927. She owns it by means of assignments also duly recorded. The second mortgage, to defendant Stark, for $3,500, was made May 17, 1927, and duly recorded May 20,1927. This was also made…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sherwood v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Gamble v. Lewis, New York County Courts1914
- Deck v. WhitmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Integrity Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1933