Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cunningham

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1885No. 9670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This action was brought to recover a quantity of hay or its value.

Plaintiffs had judgment.

Defendant moved for a new trial, which was refused, and the cause comes up on appeal from the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial.

In October, 1882, plaintiff Mary "V. Smith entered upon the northwest quarter of section 17, township 3 north, range 9 east, M. D. M., in good faith as a pre-emption claimant, claiming the right to pre-empt the same under the laws of the United States, and has ever since occupied and cultivated and has been continuously in the actual and exclusive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Pennybecker v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Grossman v. Yip WingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Cross v. RobinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hovsepian v. EskenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API