Durham v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Chief Justice.
Michael Durham appeals his multiple felony convictions in the Superior Court, claiming the trial judge erred by denying his postverdict motion for a new trial. Durham argued in his motion that a sleeping juror denied him a fair trial. After conducting a hearing, the trial judge found no evidence that the juror actually fell asleep. Because the trial judge’s findings are supported by competent evidence, we find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm.
I
In August 2002,-Durham and two others entered Michael Taylor’s Dover home seeking money. The three physically…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Albury v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- United States v. Edwin Thomas BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John F. Hendrix, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Georgia R. FreitagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- VanPelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- State v. StrangeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Brockton v. State of Alabama (INMATE 3)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2023
- Durham v. DennDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.