Legal Opinion

In Re Hanson

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho

Decided September 1, 1998No. 19-40162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

JIM D. PAPPAS, Chief Judge.

Hansons are Chapter 13 debtors appearing pro se. The Chapter 13 Trustee objects to their claim of exemption. While the Court has a limited record before it, it appears that Ms. Hanson was allegedly subjected to discriminatory and objectionable treatment as an employee of Amalgamated Sugar. According to a complaint filed on her behalf in a civil action against her employer, that treatment included an incident, in which another employee actually bit her on the buttocks. She sued claiming sexual harassment under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 and ORS §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re BovaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. In Re CiottaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1998
  3. In Re LangaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1998
  4. In Re GilbertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WhitsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2005
  2. In Re ScottiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  3. In re CopeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  4. In Re MeyerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API