Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davey v. Hall & Munson Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. Case by James Davey against the Hall & Munson Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for . defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1DissentMontgomery, J.

This is an action for personal injuries received by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of defendant in failing to provide a safe place for plaintiff to work in, and to properly construct, inspect, renew, and repair a certain tramway upon which plaintiff was employed as driver, and a fall from which caused the injury. Defendant is the owner of a large lumber-manufacturing plant at Bay Mills, in Chippewa county, composed' of sawmills, factories, lumber *207yards and docks, and about three miles of elevated tramways. The tramways are about 12 or 15 feet above the ground, and constructed in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gowen v. HarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  2. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. BivinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Goff v. Chippewa River & Menomonie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Erskine v. Chino Val. Beet-Sugar Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1895
  5. Perlick v. Detroit Wooden-Ware Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lukovski v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Conner v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API