Legal Opinion

Sedam v. Williams

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Decided June 15, 1845PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In equity.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

The bill in this case states that Williams and Hodges were partners, and that B. O. Williams purchased goods of plaintiff in his own individual name for the firm. That Williams sold out the goods to Hodges, who agreed out of the proceeds thereof, to pay the debts of B. O. Williams, contracted in the purchase of the goods, including plaintiff’s debt. That Hodges gave a bond in the penalty of sixty thousand dollars, and a mortgage, to secure the payment of said debts. The bill is filed in behalf of the creditors of the late firm, to foreclose the mortgage, etc. A judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. Mandeville & JamessonSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Pratt v. AdamsNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  3. Duke of Cumberland v. CodringtonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  4. Moses v. MurgatroydNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  5. Swift v. EckfordNew York Court of Chancery · 1836

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Thayer v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Laine v. FrancisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. De Weese v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1899
  5. Conroy v. WoodsSan Fransisco District Court · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API