Legal Opinion

Burghardt v. Ryan

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 29, 2020No. 5:19-cv-00325Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MATTHEW BURGHARDT, as Guardian ) CASE NO. 5:19-cv-325 for MATTHEW B. BURGHARDT, ) ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) JUDGE SARA LIOI ) vs. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER EZEKIEL RYAN, et al., ) ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) Before the Court for disposition are the following: (1) plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 25 [“Obj”]) to the magistrate judge’s discovery order (see Doc. No. 23 [“Disc. Order”]); (2) defendant Ezekiel Ryan’s motion (Doc. No. 28 [“Mot. Amend”]) for leave to amend his answer; and (3) defendants’ joint motion (Doc. No. 37 [“Mot.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API