Legal Opinion

Eden v. Hartt

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1898Published

Ajppeal from, a judgment of the Eleventh Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The action is for broker’s commissions. The defense is “ payment, general denial, and res adjudicata.” The case was tried on October 14, 1898, before the court and a jury. The plaintiff took the stand, and proved that he had been employed by the defendant to find a purchaser for defendant’s premises at $32,000; that he was to receive therefor 2 per cent, commission; that he procured the purchaser; that a sale took place in consequence; that he has been paid $320, on account of his commissions, but that there still remains due to him from defendant the further sum of $320. At the close of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Converse v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Marsh v. . MastertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Shaw v. . BroadbentNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Voullaire v. WiseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API