Legal Opinion

Van Auken v. Highway Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari to Highway Commissioners, etc.

1Opinion of the Court

Ghristiancy, Ch. J.

The return of the highway commissioners states that “on the 3d day of January, 1873, said commissioners of highways of the township of Vernon, did issue their notice in writing that the commissioners of highways of the town*415ships of Vernon and Shiawassee would meet at the house of D. H. Williams in Vernon, on the 18th of January, 1873, to proceed to view the premises, and ascertain and deter-1 mine the necessity of laying out said highway, and to appraise the damages thereon” (to a copy of which they refer as attached); “ that said notice was served by one of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Goldsmith v. Highway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. People ex rel. Mead v. Highway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Names v. Commissioners of Highways of Olive & RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Lane v. BurnapMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Ross v. Highway Commissioners of the Township of TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Dickinson v. Van WormerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. People ex rel. Tireman v. RuthruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API