Arbeitman v. Rabin
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Judge.
Donna Arbeitman (wife), appeals from orders of the trial court, probate division, which declared that a prenuptial agreement executed between her and decedent, Harold M. Arbeitman, was valid and binding, and that the agreement was effective to bar her rights to certain statutory allowances. We affirm.
The facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court’s order, reveal that Harold M. Arbeitman died testate. He was survived by his second wife, Donna Arbeit-man, and his children by a previous marriage, Brooke and Christopher Arbeitman. An estate was opened for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- KALPLAN v. KaplanIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Best v. CulhaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Watson v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Fleming v. FlemingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Roberts v. Estate of RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Estate of ArbeitmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Arbeitman v. ArbeitmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994