Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Randall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1931No. 8347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The claim of Randall is based upon the theory that Mrs. Purtell, the common grantor of both the lots involved in this case, in her conveyance to the Trust Company of Georgia, inserted an agreement in her deed that neither she nor her heirs or assigns would ever erect any building on the lot which she at that time reserved, and which later passed by conveyance to A. PL and C. W. Greene and from them to Thompson, the plaintiff in error, nearer to North Avenue than 42 feet from the point where the curb adjoins the roadway. The contention of Randall, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nicol & Davidson v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Bennett Lumber Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Hines v. LavantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Dotterer v. PikeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  5. Thornton v. CarverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Jenkins v. Sosebee (In Re Jenkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1987
  3. Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Murray v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Hudson v. Varn Turpentine & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API