Legal Opinion

Potter v. Murray City

District Court, D. Utah

Decided April 27, 1984No. C-83-0174CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTIONS

CHRISTENSEN, Senior District Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This case involves a civil rights claim for damages and declaratory and injunctive relief by a former police officer of Murray City who alleges that the termination of his employment because of his practice of plural marriage violated his right to the free exercise of his religion as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, contrary to the provisions of 42 United States Code § 1983.

Monetary damages are sought against the City, its Chief of Police, and the…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Potter v. Murray CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Oliverson v. West Valley CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
  4. Adamson v. City of Provo, UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993
  5. Matter of Adoption of WATUtah Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API