Legal Opinion

Loveday v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1897No. 2652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.—Hon. W. H. Pritchard, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Soott, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover upon a promissory note executed on September 3, 1894, for the sum of $600 with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum, by J. M. Dougan, Edw. S. Barlow and T. A. Bringham to the order of O. H. Anderson, and thereafter indorsed by the appellants. The makers of the note made default, but the appellants contested their liability, and have appealed from a judgment against them. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. Upon the back of the note was the following printed waiver, and below…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Record v. Rochester Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. Mooers v. StalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Murray v. NelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hurley-Mason Co. v. Pacific Commissary Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API