People v. Mitchell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
—The defendant was informed against for the crime of murder, and convicted for killing Oscar Crandall at the county of Tehama, on the twenty-fourth day of April, 1891. The appeal is from a final judgment, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
On a former trial defendant was convicted of murder, and on appeal to this court a new trial was ordered. (People v. Mitchell, 94 Cal. 550.)
C. A. Boyden and Frank Hughes were charged in the same information with defendant; Boyden had been tried, and acquitted, and Hughes had been discharged without a trial.
It appears, also, that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. NittiIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. ErnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. BuonoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.