Haefele v. Davis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Eagen,
Indispensable to the setting of the instant appeal in its proper perspective (an approach necessitated by the questions raised) is a brief resume of the procedural adventures of an earlier case involving fundamentally the same substantive, undisputed facts; for, it is with a correct interpretation and application of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel that we are here primarily concerned.
Plaintiffs Haefele and Hares were suspended from their jobs with Vulcan Iron Works, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, on June 27, 191/9. Plaintiff Lord’s suspension was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coleman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Stradley v. Bath Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Schwan v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Haefele v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Haefele v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Callery v. Blythe Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Robert Wade v. City of Pittsburgh, Victor Muto and William BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Ashdale (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Wilson v. Sharon Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.