Legal Opinion

Hylan v. Finegan

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for a writ of prohibition.

1Opinion of the CourtRudd, J.

Application is made for a writ of prohibition. The petitioners are the officials constituting the board of estimate and apportionment of the city of New York, uniting with the city chamberlain and the corporation counsel of the city of New York. The *687petitioners complain that Thomas E. Finegan, as acting commissioner of education of the state of New York, is unlawfully and illegally assuming ‘ ‘ to adjudicate and determine the proper and lawful disposition of public moneys apportioned to the City of New York under and pursuant to thé provisions of the Education Law. ’ ’

Thomas E. Finegan, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bd. of Education v. . FinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Higgins v. ApplebaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Hylan v. FineganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API