Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Bacardi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 10, 1981No. 80-2384PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court granted a temporary injunction but did not require the posting of a bond [there was no attempt to come within the exception to this rule. See: Santona-Nervia Corporation v. Publix Market, Inc., 146 So.2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Hoffman v. White, 235 So.2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(b).] Upon a motion to dissolve, the trial court refused to dissolve the temporary injunction. This appeal ensued. We reverse.

Except in limited circumstances, which are not present in this case, a temporary injunction may not be issued without the posting of a bond. La Gran Familia,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Crow, Pope & Carter, Inc. v. JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. La Gran Familia, Inc. v. Cuba Pharmacy, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Santona-Nervia Corp. v. Publix Market, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AOT, Inc. v. Hampshire Management Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API