Barnett v. Bacardi
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The trial court granted a temporary injunction but did not require the posting of a bond [there was no attempt to come within the exception to this rule. See: Santona-Nervia Corporation v. Publix Market, Inc., 146 So.2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Hoffman v. White, 235 So.2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(b).] Upon a motion to dissolve, the trial court refused to dissolve the temporary injunction. This appeal ensued. We reverse.
Except in limited circumstances, which are not present in this case, a temporary injunction may not be issued without the posting of a bond. La Gran Familia,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoffman v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Crow, Pope & Carter, Inc. v. JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- La Gran Familia, Inc. v. Cuba Pharmacy, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Santona-Nervia Corp. v. Publix Market, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- AOT, Inc. v. Hampshire Management Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995