Hogan v. Nagel
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Presiding Justice.
We granted the application for interlocutory review in this habeas action to consider whether a person involuntarily committed to a mental health facility following an acquittal by reason of insanity must first exhaust remedies under the criminal procedure code before seeking habeas relief. Because the mental health code specifically permits an involuntary detainee to seek habeas relief “at any time,” we conclude that exhaustion of remedies is not required and affirm the habeas court.
In 1981 David Nagel was acquitted of murder based on an insanity plea. A person…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morton v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Nagel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Richardson v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Nagel v. OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hammock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Bonney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Hogan v. NagelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Hogan v. NagelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001