Henry v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

Because I believe the facts of this case fall within the purview of this Court's decision in Busby v. Truswal Systems Corp.,551 So.2d 322 (Ala. 1989), and specifically because I do not believe Ms. Henry presented substantial evidence indicating that Georgia-Pacific had sufficient knowledge of Dr. Deeble's actions to satisfy the elements of the tort of outrage, I dissent.

Although the majority has outlined most of the relevant facts of this case, I wish to discuss some of them in more detail. The evidence indicates that the lurid session with Dr. Deeble occurred on April 7, 1992. Afterwards,…