Legal Opinion

Templeton v. City of Tekamah

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for Burt county. Tried below before Wakeley, J. State, ex rel. A. & N. JR. Co., v. Board Co. Com’rs, 4 Neb., 537; Smails v. White, Id., 353; Hurford v. Omaha, Id., 350; 2 Dillon, Mun. Corp., sec. 673.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ch. J.

The city of Tekamah brought an action against the plaintiff in error, upon an ordinance of said city, which provides for the levying and collection of a license tax upon the keeping and using of stallions and jacks for breeding purposes, within the corporate limits of the city of Tekamah. The petition set out the said ordinance, the first section of which provides that “ there is hereby levied upon each and every person, firm, association, or corporation keeping or using any stallion or jack for breeding purposes within the corporate limits of Tekamah, the sum of ten dollars for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magneau v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. GreenNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Aachen & Munich Fire Insurance v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. German-American Fire Insurance v. City of MindenNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Norris v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  5. City of York v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API