Golden v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original proceeding in mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
The plaintiff asks for a writ of mandamus directing the recently appointed judge of the fifteenth judicial district to hear, consider and determine on its merits the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in a case which was tried prior to defendant’s appointment.
During the year 1919, the regular district judge, Hon. R. M. Pickier, who had presided for many years in that district (Smith and other counties), suffered from inpaired health, and some time late in that year, Charles L. Kagey, Esquire, a Beloit lawyer, was elected judge pro tempore in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. KeehnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- In re MillingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Lasnier v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Tacha v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Duffitt & Ramsey v. CrozierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morton v. City of AuroraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Day v. McCandlessMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
- Hancock v. NyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- State Ex Rel. First Nat. Bank v. OgdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.