Legal Opinion

In re Bailey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1989No. 89-129PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The trial court ordered the appointment of co-guardians for appellant’s estate. We reverse and dismiss.

Appellees, Debbie Mayville and Clarice Roberts, daughters of appellant, filed a petition in probate court praying that they be appointed co-guardians of the person and estate of appellant because of his alcoholism. The probate court found that appellant was not competent to handle his business affairs and appointed appellees co-guardians of his estate.

Appellant raises two interrelated points of appeal: first, that appellees did not satisfy the requirements of Ark.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Loyd v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Autry v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Cogburn v. WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  3. In Re Guardianship of Matthew HeltonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Autry v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Cogburn v. WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API