Legal Opinion

Amick v. Hickey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. Docket No. 71, Calendar No. 35,107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiffs seek to recover from defendant $21,553.38 and accrued interest as compensation claimed to be due them for services rendered as income tax experts and accountants under a written contract with defendant providing for such services and compensation therefor. Plaintiffs claim that by reason of mutual mistake the contract as executed does not conform to the agreement of the parties and on this account they also seek its reformation. In the circuit court plaintiffs were decreed the relief sought. Defendant has appealed.

On the 31st of May, 1921, defendant entered into a contract with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenough v. WillcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wood v. TruaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Weber v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roy Annett, Inc. v. KillinMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Teeter v. TeeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Granader v. Public BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API