Legal Opinion

Northrup v. Jay

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1933No. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 36,649PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

On December 16,1927, plaintiff brought • replevin, and certain household furniture was taken on the writ. On December 22, 1927, defendant Jay executed a redelivery bond (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14823), with defendant Detroit Fidelity & Surety Company as surety. Declaration and plea were filed during the same month.

On February 3, 1930, the cause was dismissed without prejudice as one in which no progress had' been made for more than one year. 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14253.

On November 21, 1931, plaintiff made motion to reinstate the cause, alleging inadvertence, and appealing to the grace of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SlaterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1898
  2. Miller v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Scheinman v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Klopfenstein v. RohlfingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lilienthal v. City of WyandotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hailey v. Saginaw Justice of the PeaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sanders v. LoydCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  5. Rubsam Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API