Legal Opinion

Veillon v. Lafleur's Estate

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 3, 1926No. 27799PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

The applicant here is the widow of the de eujus, and she claims the so-called “widow’s homestead,” being the $1,000 allowed to a widow left in necessitous circumstances out of the estate of her deceased husband, by the terms of article 3252 of the Revised Civil Code of 1870, as amended by Act 17 of 1917, p. 25 (Ex. Sess.) and Act 242 of 1918, p: 433.

Her claim was allowed by the district court, but was rejected by the Court of Appeal, and this court granted her application for review of the judgment of the Court of Appeal “as a matter of right,” under the provisions of section 11 of article 7…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Succession of JustusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  2. Richard v. LazardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Rogge v. NouvetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  4. In re Coreil's EstateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. Normand v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Malone v. CannonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Jones v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Succession of TaconSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  5. Succession of SciaccalugaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API