Legal Opinion
Bitang v. REGIONAL MANPOWER ADMIN. OF US DEPT. OF LABOR
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 11, 1972No. 72 C 1099PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
TONE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are aliens currently residing in the United States who sought immigrant visas for permanent residence under 8 U.S.C. § 1153(a)(3). That section provides for “third preference” to those “qualified immigrants who are members of the professions, or who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences or the arts will substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural interests, or welfare of the United States.”
Plaintiffs Severino Bitang, Evelyn De Borja, Renato Guttierrez, Jose Macaisa and Guillermo Reyes claim…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Song Jook Suh v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Golabek v. REGIONAL MANPOWER ADMIN., US DEPT. OF LABORDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Wan Ching Shek v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
3Cited by22 opinions
- Richard B. Pesikoff v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Secretary of Labor of the United States v. Phil Farino and Hoe Kow Cantonese RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Reddy, Inc., Vishwas B. Dhekney v. United States Department of Labor, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Digilab, Inc. And Guillermo Ferla v. The Secretary of Labor and Lawrence W. RogersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Production Tool Corporation and Manuel Aguilar v. Employment and Training Administration, United States Department of Labor, Kenall Manufacturing Company and Blanca Fabian v. Employment and Training Administration, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.