Legal Opinion

Official Creditors' Committee for QMect, Inc. v. Electrochem Funding, LLC (In re QMect, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided September 21, 2006No. Bankruptcy No. 04-41044 T; Adversary No. 04-4189 ATPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

LESLIE TCHAIKOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Official Unsecured Creditors’ Committee (the “Committee”) for the above-captioned debtor (the “Debtor”) moves to amend its complaint in the above-captioned adversary proceeding (the “Complaint”) to add and delete certain claims as well as to change the wording slightly of some of the existing claims. Defendants Electrochem Funding, LLC (“Funding”) and Burlingame Capital Partners II, L.P. (“Burlingame”)(collectively “Defendants”) oppose the addition or modification of the existing claims. They oppose…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Marx v. Loral Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Spaulding Composites Co. (In Re Spaulding Composites Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Crawford v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024
  3. Diaz v. Sun-Maid Growers of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API