Legal Opinion
Vodos v. Coopersmith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 14, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, etc., the defendants Harvey Cooper-smith and Radiology Associates of Brooklyn, LLI] appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated February 4, 2010, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and the defendant Mark Schwartz separately appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the same order as denied that branch of his separate motion, made jointly with the defendant Eugene…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Stukas v. StreiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Gomez v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mosezhnik v. BerensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Cherise v. BraffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matos v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- King v. DobrinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matos v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013