Legal Opinion

Moore v. White

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to First District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCurrier, Judge

The parties to this suit were occupants of adjoining lands— ■their respective fields being separated by a fence. A considerable number of the defendant’s domestic animals broke through this fence and into the plaintiff’s adjoining field and injured his cropsH This suit is brought to recover the consequent damages. The only questions for consideration relate to the legal sufficiency , of the fence, and the right of the plaintiff to the enjoyment of its benefits.

The case shows that the fence ivas constructed some eighteen years since by the then proprietor of the farm now occupied by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gorman v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holwerson v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Utley v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Stovall v. EmersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Coates v. AchesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Fenton v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API