Legal Opinion

R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 31, 1960No. 64250; protest 59/5292 (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case is before us for decision on a written stipulation of submission wherein counsel for the respective parties have agreed to the following set of facts:

1 — That the merchandise the subject of the above-entitled protest, described on the invoices as “PF 1 photoflash bulbs” or “PF 1/B photoflash bulbs”, consists of photoflash lamps composed in chief value of blown glass which were classified as blown glassware and assessed for duty at 30 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 218(f), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Japan T.D. 53865, and are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. B. B. T. Corp. of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Milnor, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API