Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Van DeMark

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William A. Porter, Joseph E. Gary, and John A. Jameson, Judges, presiding. The opinion of the court contains a statement of the material facts of the case, except that the bill of exceptions was signed by the Hon. William A. Porter.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

This was an action of assumpsit, in the Superior Court of Cook county, brought by Van DeMark and Chandler against Harvey, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, for six hundred and twenty-eight dollars in damages.

To reverse this judgment the defendant appeals.

It appeal’s the plaintiffs were dealers in lumber, on a small scale, in Chicago, and the defendant, also, on a scale more extensive, and from whom plaintiffs had purchased a cargo of lumber, brought by a vessel called the “Holmes,” which proved to be very good. They claim, the cargo, which is the subject of this…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Rice v. CunninghamIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wayland v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Sullivan v. Milledge, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1949
  4. People Ex Rel. Rice v. CunninghamIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Pike v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API