Legal Opinion

Hoefer v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1992No. WD 44200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the granting of a directed verdict for the defendants at the end of the plaintiffs’ opening statement. This suit brought under the rescue doctrine is for damages suffered when the appellant Forrest Hoefer was helping the driver of the respondent’s vehicle, which had skidded off an icy highway.

Despite a welter of objections and incorrect rulings, counsel for Hoefer managed to bring out the following in opening statement: The defendant Johnson was driving the auto of the defendant Roche south on Highway 13 toward Higginsville, on the first day of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Lowrey v. HorvathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. Metzger v. SchermesserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Strake v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Hanes v. Bacon Sales Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giles v. American Family Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Angoff v. American Financial Security Life Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Rasmussen v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API