Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Evans

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1985No. D.D. No. 85-9PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent has violated DR 9-102(A), 5-101(A), 5-104(A), 5-105(A) and (B), 9-102(B)(2), (3) and (4), and Gov. Bar R. V. Wherefore, this court accepts the recommendation of the board and hereby orders that the respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

It is further ordered that respondent pay the costs of these proceedings and that such costs be assessed herein to respondent for which judgment is hereby rendered.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. CarlsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API