Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Shackleford v. Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for a joint trial. Involved are separate, unrelated accidents and separate trials will enable the juries to focus on the factual issues presented as to each accident (CPLR 602; Abbatepaolo v Blumberg, 7 AD2d 847; Pride v Perras, 6 AD2d 842; cf. Doll v Castiglione, 86 AD2d 711). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Rubin, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doll v. CastiglioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Pride v. PerrasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Abbatepaolo v. BlumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boyman v. BryantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Brown v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. McGee v. CataldiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Continental Building Co. v. Town of North SalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Alburquerque v. Beautiful Village Associates Redevelopment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API