Henley v. Henley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Presiding Justice.
The sole assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is on a nunc pro tunc order of the trial judge consolidating for trial the wife’s action for alimony and the husband’s divorce action. The bill of exceptions recites that counsel for both parties agreed in open court for the consolidation to be made at the time of the trial, wherein alimony was awarded to the wife and child. From the record it appears that the alimony judgment was rendered approximately 18 months prior to the nunc pro tunc order of consolidation, which was entered on the application of the wife,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
3Cited by8 opinions
- Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Dodd v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Rush v. Southern Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Pirkle v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.