Legal Opinion

Hale v. Barker

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1900No. S.F. No. 1708PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1 The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

This action was commenced in the superior court of Fresno county -by the American Savings and Loan Association, a corporation having its place of business at Minneapolis, in the state of Minnesota, to foreclose a mortgage executed by John A. Barker and wife upon property situate in Fresno. Prior to the commencement of the action defendant W. H. McKenzie became the owner of the mortgaged property, and, having assumed Barker’s liability, he alone answered.

During the pendency of the action the said savings and loan association became insolvent, and W. D. Hale, having been appointed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western Savings Co. v. HoustonOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Groover v. Pacific Coast Sav. SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People's Building & Loan Ass'n v. McPhilamyMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Colonial & United States Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API