People v. Richardson

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgments of conviction rendered November 16, 2004 and December 14, 2004 affirmed.

We find unavailing defendant’s present challenge to the facial sufficiency of the accusatory instrument charging criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree (Penal Law § 170.20). The factual portion of the information alleged, inter alia, that at the subway station at Grand Central terminal defendant approached and spoke with at least five persons; that defendant, in exchange for money, “ swipe [d] a Metrocard through the turnstile” allowing one person entry into the subway…