Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Looney

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1981No. 36936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Justice.

Appellants and appellee, sisters and brother, are the heirs at law of Clarence Looney, a brother who died intestate. The decedent left an estate of approximately $26,000. Appellants brought this action to obtain a rescission of their agreements with appellee in which each, for the sum of $2,000.00, released their respective claims to the estate. Appellants contend they were fraudulently induced by appellee to release their interests. The jury returned a verdict for appellants, but the trial court granted appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We reverse.

1.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Cochran v. MurrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Ringer v. LockhartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Collier v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Cowart v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kienel v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. DOUGLAS COE v. PROSKAUER ROSE LLPSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  3. Tri-Eastern Petroleum Corp. v. Glenn's Super Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Golden Atlanta Site Development, Inc. v. NahaiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Horton v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API