In re the Estate of Anderson
Arizona Supreme Court
'APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Graham. G. W. Shute, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
Peter Anderson and Isabell Anderson, husband and wife, on the twenty-fifth day of August, 1902, being the owners of certain community property and having no issue, made and executed an instrument, bearing soine of the characteristics of a deed, but clearly indicating by its recitals a testamentary purpose, inasmuch as it was to have no effect until after the death of the testators. Counsel for both parties unite in affirming its testamentary character and we think correctly so. It is reciprocal in its terms in that each purports to give all his interest in the common property to the other,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tyler v. TylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- McAnnulty v. McAnnultyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Corker v. CorkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sanders v. SimcichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Francis v. MarshWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Estate of TriggCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Anderson v. HandeArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re MacKevich's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Branchflower v. MasseyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Fuller v. TodSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.